674 days ago

The Water Services Bill and the Waitakere Ranges Water Catchment

The Team from Deborah Russell, MP for New Lynn

There's been a bit of noise locally about the Water Services Bill with some people suggesting it would mean that water catchments in the Waitakere Ranges would be transferred to the new Auckland/Northland water entity.
This is NOT the case. But I checked it with the Minister during the debate today. I asked: "Following on from the question about stormwater, I have a similar one related to concern from my own area, the New Lynn electorate, which includes the entire Waitakere Ranges. A number of people in the Waitakere Ranges have expressed concern that the land there might transfer to the new water services entities and pass out of local control because it has significant water catchment dams there. They're very beautiful, very important to Auckland, near 100 percent full, but the real worry is the surrounding water catchment. So I'm asking if the Minister could please give some assurance that the land, the park—the beautiful Waitakere Ranges Park—will remain in local control under the new water services entities."
The Minister replied saying: "I want to come to the particular question of the member in relation to parks and reserves because I think the question is broader and it is one that warrants a response. The criteria for transferring stormwater infrastructure is based on whether it is predominantly used to manage stormwater, as I've said many times in this House, and whether it's critical to the stormwater system. In general, parks' predominant use is not for stormwater. Their predominant use is as a park, a public recreation place where people love to go, and therefore they will not transfer to the new entities. That's something that needs to be said very clearly. Territorial authorities will be heavily involved, as I've said previously, in identifying which infrastructure will transfer to entities. I must stress this point because it is by consent of the councils, not over and above them, because everybody preserves their quality of life through having good recreational places to take their children and the like. A park would never, therefore, be transferred out of territorial authority management if it was not the wish of the territorial authority. So, I really wanted to highlight that."

More messages from your neighbours
2 hours ago

Quicker, better, trades recruitment.

Trade Jobs

Need skilled tradies fast? Trade Jobs NZ connects you with the best person for the job. With thousands of tradespeople searching for opportunities, our Trades specific platform makes it easy for you to reach qualified candidates.

Using targeted job ads, social media campaigns and applicant screening, our services are designed to simplify the recruitment process, helping you hire quicker and more effectively.

Register today and discover how Trade Jobs NZ can streamline your recruitment process and connect with the right candidates across Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Find out more

Image
2 hours ago

New lottery, new home

Heart Foundation Lottery

Soak up the Marlborough sun with the Heart Foundation Lottery.

For just $15 a ticket, you could win this brand-new, fully furnished Jennian home in breathtaking Blenheim.

Surrounded by stunning mountain views, this home features three bedrooms, two bathrooms, and a spacious open-plan kitchen, living, and dining area.

Get your tickets today at heartlottery.org.nz.
Find out more

Image
2 days ago

Poll: Should employees be able to work from home?

The Team from Neighbourly.co.nz

At the post-Cabinet press conference, the National Party asserted they want public sector staff to return to the office. This has opened a conversation about other sectors in New Zealand who have adopted working from home (WFH).

Where possible, do you think employees should be able to work from home? Vote below and share your thoughts in the comments.

Image
Should employees be able to work from home?
  • 70.1% Yes
    70.1% Complete
  • 26.8% No
    26.8% Complete
  • 3.1% Other - I'll share below
    3.1% Complete
1265 votes