Council not collecting enough money
By local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
The West Coast Regional Council is being warned it is not collecting enough money from rates, and will need to consider using its investments again to subsidise rates.
The council's financial manager raised the matter as it received a report on its investment portfolio at a Risk and Assurance Committee meeting on February 20.
Committee chairperson Frank Dooley said fund manager JB Were had advised "a cautious stance" over divesting its portfolio.
Acting corporate services manager Aaron Prendergast said the draft long-term plan suggested using funds generated from this portfolio to reduce rates.
The council was "under rating".
"It is timely for some of those decisions around how the portfolio operates," he said.
Dooley said the council's rates income should generate debate again this year.
He repeated his previous stance that council could not afford to keep rates down if it were to meet its statutory responsibilities.
"This council has under rated for a number of years, and as a result we have accumulated a number of deficits," he said.
"As we go through the LTP consultation phase I think this is something that will be … debated quite rigorously."
That included the role of the investment portfolio and rates income, Dooley said.
The ouncil's investment fund closed for the six months to December 31 at just over $13 million, $431,484 higher from July 1 ($12.57m).
Its catastrophe fund sat at $495,817 while awaiting the $1m previously spent in Westport in 2022.
According to the investment report, the council owes $11.4m via the Local Government Funding Agency, and nearly $2m under a 'multi-option credit loan' with Westpac.
Prendergast said the council needed to weigh up its investment and its capacity to use that to subsidise rates increases.
"I think the quantum if we were to reinvest as opposed to subsidise rates is about $1 million a year," he said.
Councillor Brett Cummings said council had previously used investment income to subsidise rates income, but this saw the investment fund growth rate slowly decrease.
Subsequently, the council chose to build up the main fund again, with the last withdrawal in 2021.
Dooley was the sole dissenter against the 2023-24 increase of 16.4%, saying it needed to be much higher.
Meantime, some ratepayers are still unclear what their total 2023-24 rates bills will be.
Poll: Should the government levy industries that contribute to financial hardship?
As reported in the Post, there’s a $30 million funding gap in financial mentoring. This has led to services closing and mentors stepping in unpaid just to keep helping people in need 🪙💰🪙
One proposed solution? Small levies on industries that profit from financial hardship — like banks, casinos, and similar companies.
So we want to hear what you think:
Should the government ask these industries to contribute?
-
59.6% Yes, supporting people is important!
-
26% No, individuals should take responsibility
-
14.4% ... It is complicated
A Neighbourly Riddle! Don’t Overthink It… Or Do?😜
Do you think you know the answer? Simply 'Like' this post if you know the answer and the big reveal will be posted in the comments at 2pm on the day!
If you multiply this number by any other number, the answer will always be the same. What number is this?
Have you got New Zealand's best shed? Show us and win!
Once again, Resene and NZ Gardener are on the hunt for New Zealand’s best shed! Send in the photos and the stories behind your man caves, she sheds, clever upcycled spaces, potty potting sheds and colourful chicken coops. The Resene Shed of the Year 2026 winner receives $1000 Resene ColorShop voucher, a $908 large Vegepod Starter Pack and a one-year subscription to NZ Gardener. To enter, tell us in writing (no more than 500 words) why your garden shed is New Zealand’s best, and send up to five high-quality photos by email to mailbox@nzgardener.co.nz. Entries close February 23, 2026.
Loading…
