Know what’s happening
Access the private noticeboard for verified neighbours near you. Keep informed about any suspicious activity, send urgent updates to your neighbours when required and discuss emergency planning.
Get to know your neighbours
Browse the directory and start getting to know your neighbours. Don’t want to post to the whole neighbourhood? Send a private message.
Buy, sell and give away
Want to declutter your garage? Buy some used household items? Give away some garden stuff? Become a verified neighbour to browse and post items for sale. Trading is simple when everyone lives nearby.
Thank you for using Neighbourly
You may receive an email confirmation for any offer you selected. The associated companies will contact you directly to activate your requests.
Nicole Mathewson Reporter from The Press
By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter
A small North Canterbury community group’s efforts to build a new hall in the local domain has received the backing of its local community board.
The Sefton Public Hall Society plans to build a new community hall at the Sefton Domain, which is … View moreBy David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter
A small North Canterbury community group’s efforts to build a new hall in the local domain has received the backing of its local community board.
The Sefton Public Hall Society plans to build a new community hall at the Sefton Domain, which is expected to cost about $3.3 million.
After obtaining a lease for 900m2 of land at the domain, the society engaged consultancy firm TMCo, which assessed the site, and found the wastewater system had ‘‘failed’’.
‘‘The water from the septic tank was ponding and not draining away,’’ society president Ian Lochhead said.
The council was contacted and portaloos have been placed on the site.
The Woodend-Sefton Community Board met last week and recommended the council’s community and recreation committee approve funding of up to $180,000 to replace the wastewater system.
The news is a relief to the society, as the project’s costs were already escalating, Lochhead said.
The society has already spent nearly $84,000 on preliminary work and initial designs.
Estimated costs have more than doubled over the last few years to $3.3 million due in part to rising material costs.
The proposed new building will include a main hall with a floor area of 304m2, a meeting room and commercial kitchen.
It will also have outdoor sports changing facilities and a toilet, which will be available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to replace the domain sports pavilion.
‘‘It is future proofing our community for 50 years, and maybe longer,’’ Lochhead said.
To date the society has raised about a third of the funds needed through cash and assets, including earthquake insurance, a $200,000 contribution from the council and funds raised from raffles and quiz nights.
The council has also agreed to fund the cost of a resource consent.
The society plans to sell the old Sefton Hall site on Upper Sefton Rd, along with the former Sefton Library site to boost the funds.
It is ready to make a big fundraising push, and will apply for community grants and look for sponsors.
The old Sefton Hall was built in 1966 to replace an earlier hall.
But it was damaged in 2010 and 2011 earthquakes, leaving it at about 37 percent of the building code.
An engineering assessment was completed in 2017, followed by a feasibility study in 2020.
Repairing the hall would require bringing it to 67% of code and cost close to $1 million.
It is still used almost every day by various different community groups, Lochhead said.
‘‘The council has allowed us to use it without doing major works because they know we have a plan for the new build.’’
The domain is used by the Ashley Rugby Club, Sefton Cricket Club, Sefton Tennis Club and various other activities.
■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Nicole Mathewson Reporter from The Press
By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter
A small community fears a proposed gun sports park could ruin their rural outlook in North Canterbury.
Loburn resident Marie Jones said locals are concerned the proposed airsoft sports facility will devalue their properties and impact the rural setting.… View moreBy David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter
A small community fears a proposed gun sports park could ruin their rural outlook in North Canterbury.
Loburn resident Marie Jones said locals are concerned the proposed airsoft sports facility will devalue their properties and impact the rural setting.
However, the director of the company behind the park says it's a family sport and could actually increase local house values.
Christchurch-based Arena Ltd has applied to the Waimakariri District Council for a resource consent to establish an airsoft sports and recreation activity park on Fishers Rd, near Loburn.
Similar to paintball, the sport uses airsoft pellets instead of bullets.
Jones said she found out about the proposal after a neighbour, who runs a business in Rangiora, overheard a conversation and then contacted the council.
The neighbours got together last week, fearing the consent could be approved without being notified.
The council had been trying to sell a 6.5-hectare block for sometime, before subdividing the property, with Arena Ltd buying 4ha.
Residents were concerned about the fire risk from the property, where the spraying noxious weeds has not been kept up, Jones said.
‘‘As neighbours we have phoned the council at least twice a year to do something.
‘‘It is always a danger waiting to happen.’’
The Loburn community was devastated by a major fire in the district in January.
Fishers Rd is narrow and not designed to take increased traffic and has a blind rise just before the property, she said.
A Waimakariri District Council spokesperson confirmed a resource consent application has been received to operate an airsoft sports facility at Loburn.
The application is on hold while the council seeks further information from the applicant.
Once the information has been received, the council will process the application as either a non-notified, limited notified or publicly notified consent.
Arena Ltd director Ken Yep said the company has been operating an airsoft sports facility near Christchurch since 2011.
‘‘We are trying to replicate it in more of a natural forest setting.’’
He said he was keen to preserve the natural forestry on the site, and was working to clear away the noxious weeds.
Arena Ltd was working with council planners and had brought in engineers to assess the likely noise levels and was planning to design fire breaks.
Yep said the park would mainly be open in the weekends, with some private groups onsite during the week.
‘‘I don’t think it will drop their property values at all and I think it will increase their values.
‘‘It is gun related, but it is a proper sport and everyone enjoys it and we get a lot of young people and families coming out.
‘‘We are not some weird group which causes all sorts of problems.’’
Yep said he would be happy to meet with residents to address their concerns.
■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Nicole Mathewson Reporter from The Press
By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter
Kaikōura has no active stock movement rules, but no-one seems to have noticed.
Kaikōura District Council operations senior manager Dave Clibbery said the council’s stock movement bylaw, to manage stock movement on roads and roadsides, was due to … View moreBy David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter
Kaikōura has no active stock movement rules, but no-one seems to have noticed.
Kaikōura District Council operations senior manager Dave Clibbery said the council’s stock movement bylaw, to manage stock movement on roads and roadsides, was due to reviewed in 2016, but was overlooked and has since expired.
‘‘While we still have the bylaw referenced on our website, it is technically not enforceable.
‘‘The severity is not particularly great and we have limited stock movement activity.’’
Council records indicated there had been issues in the past, which suggested farmers might think the bylaw is still in place, he said.
Having an active bylaw allowed the council to set thresholds for when actions needed to be taken, such as when farmers may be required to install stock underpasses.
The worst case scenario would a serious accident from a vehicle hitting an animal on the road, while cow urine could also damage the seal on the road, Clibbery said.
A stock movement bylaw was first introduced in 1986 by the farmer Kaikōura County Council.
This was replaced by a new Kaikōura District Council bylaw in 1995, which expired before the most recent bylaw was introduced in 2011.
The bylaw was due to reviewed in 2016, the year of the 7.8 magnitude earthquake which devastated the district, and has since expired.
Clibbery said the 2011 bylaw was generally ‘‘fit for purpose’’ and he proposed some minor amendments, including distinguishing between roadside races and ‘long acre’ roadside grazing, and prohibiting droving at night.
At a recent workshop, councillors instructed staff to prepare a revised stock movement bylaw to be considered at a future council meeting, before going out for consultation.
■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Nicole Mathewson Reporter from The Press
By local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
A West Coast river engineer claims the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) "kicked up a bit of a ruckus" when the council requested a joint visit to critical flood protection work on State Highway 6.
The NZTA has been managing key South Westland … View moreBy local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
A West Coast river engineer claims the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) "kicked up a bit of a ruckus" when the council requested a joint visit to critical flood protection work on State Highway 6.
The NZTA has been managing key South Westland river crossings, at the Wanganui and Whataroa bridges, for the past 18 months.
The willingness of NZTA to work with the West Coast Regional Council on the route security of the state highway has been described as "very precious".
The regional council's Infrastructure Governance Committee has been keeping an eye on how NZTA is managing the flood risk.
This week, council's chief river engineer Peter Blackwood said he had asked the agency for a joint visit to the sites to give their perspective and insight, "but NZTA kicked up a bit of a ruckus on that".
"NZTA are very precious about their works … they don't like it when we talk to them about it," Blackwood said.
He said they were concerned the clock was ticking towards August - the start of the Spring flood season - when it might be "too late".
NZTA has been approached for comment.
Earlier in the year, the council said it would write to the agency outlining its concerns.
This included the need to ensure the bridges were not left compromised by a delay to flood protection work, and to ensure it fitted with council's own approach to managing the flood risk at both rivers.
In particular, the council was concerned about how work by the agency might undermine or compromise flood protection work downstream, given it manages assets on behalf of the Whataroa and Wanganui special rating districts.
River diversion spurs had been installed by NZTA at the southern Whataroa Bridge approach, with a retrospective consent application to come, an action point before the July 9 meeting said.
Design work for similar work at the Wanganui south bank was under way and council expected a consent application in due course.
Council chief executive Darryl Lew said he was concerned "no-one would get the opportunity to submit" if NZTA undertook an emergency consent application process, taking a non-notification approach.
This would leave out locals living in the area adjoining both bridges.
"What we are hearing here is that the rating scheme members would want to have a view on that," Lew said.
Infrastructure chairperson Frank Dooley said it was not too late for their input on the Wanganui consent.
But councillor Brett Cummings said he could not fathom NZTA justifying using emergency consent provisions under the Resource Management Act, due to the time since the bridge issues arose.
"I find it a bit hard to believe the NZTA are using emergency ones on the Whataroa Bridge when everyone has known about it for so long."
Cummings said council had to put its special rating district concerns to the forefront given the potential serious impact of their work causing the river to 'kick' to the other side and causing havoc downstream.
"If they (NZTA) are going to do work that sends the river to the other side, who is going to pay?
"We should have full control what goes in the river I feel."
Councillor Peter Haddock said the council had "worked hard on NZTA" for route security in recent times, particularly to get work done at the Wanganui and it had been raised again in a South Island regional transport meeting last week.
Nicole Mathewson Reporter from The Press
By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter
Community concerns over the environmental impact of a proposed landfill in North Canterbury have led to a local community board taking a stand.
The Rangiora-Ashley Community Board will make a submission against a landfill being proposed by Christchurch … View moreBy David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter
Community concerns over the environmental impact of a proposed landfill in North Canterbury have led to a local community board taking a stand.
The Rangiora-Ashley Community Board will make a submission against a landfill being proposed by Christchurch firm Protranz Earthmoving Limited at its quarry at White Rock, near North Loburn.
Protranz has lodged resource consent applications with Environment Canterbury and the Waimakariri District Council to construct and operate a proposed landfill for the disposal of building and demolition waste, and contaminated soil material.
Board chairperson Jim Gerard said the community board members decided to stand alongside the local community, who were concerned about the risks to groundwater and the local Karetu River.
He said the board would seek financial assistance from the Waimakariri District Council to seek specialist advice to help prepare its submission.
‘‘We are representing the community so we need to ensure whatever information we do present, is presented as well as it is able to be.’’
At a recent meeting, a sub-committee of Gerard and board members Ivan Campbell and Kirstyn Barnett, who represent the board’s Ashley sub-division, was appointed to work on the submission.
Gerard said he had met with White Rock and North Loburn residents to discuss their concerns.
‘‘We talked about what we were doing and have kept them informed.’’
A residents’ group is preparing its own submission.
Oxford residents and the Oxford-Ohoka Community Board were recently successful in their opposition to a proposed landfill at View Hill, near Oxford.
Questions have been raised about whether another landfill is needed, given the Kate Valley Landfill, a regional landfill in North Canterbury, has plenty of capacity.
‘‘It is particularly well managed and internationally noted for its operation,’’ Gerard said.
‘‘We would hope any consent, if granted, will cover all of those things.’’
The Burwood Landfill in Christchurch had its consent to operate extended last month for another two years to June 2026, because it has yet to reach its capacity.
About 100 White Rock and Loburn residents attended a public meeting in February and have since formed an incorporated society to organisation the opposition to the landfill proposal.
Spokesperson Mike McCaleb said there ‘‘was a high degree of anger, disappointment and resentment’’ expressed by people throughout North Canterbury.
‘‘So many people were depressed, stressed and feeling hopeless about their ability to affect the proceedings.’’
Bouyed by the recent Oxford landfill decision, the residents now feel more confident.
‘‘We are a small community with a big heart. We have many passionate and committed professionals in our community.’’
McCaleb said residents were concerned about the potential environmental damage to the Karetu River, which feeds into the Okuku River and then the Ashley/Rakahuri River.
Increased truck movements was another concern, particularly trucks carrying asbestos and other contaminants to the landfill.
Protranz general manager Shaun Coakley said he respected the community board’s decision.
‘‘We knew the development of critical infrastructure such as a managed fill landfill would attract attention from the local community, hence our decision to voluntarily publicly notify.
‘‘Whether by providing additional information that clarifies their issues or collaborating to establish consent conditions that mitigate their concerns, we're committed to an open dialogue.’’
Consents have been lodged with both Environment Canterbury and the Waimakariri District Council, and are on hold, awaiting more information.
■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Loading…
Are you sure? Deleting this message permanently removes it from the Neighbourly website.
Loading…