749 days ago

Family bach owners allowed to remain on conservation land

Nicole Mathewson Reporter from The Press

By local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:

Family baches on West Coast conservation land will be able to remain - for now - after fears they would be pushed out.

The win for the owners, who have in some cases owned the baches for generations, follows negotiations with the Department of Conservation (DOC).

In early 2023, the ongoing use of family baches on conservation land was deemed "a privilege, not a right" by the department.

The comment was made after fears were raised about the future tenure of West Coast baches on conservation land at a West Coast Conservation Board meeting.

Poerua River bach owner and Greymouth lawyer Colin Smith said on January 10 "a significant group" of West Coast bach owners, who mobilised in 2023, had reached a solution with the department.

It meant the concessions for bach owners would continue as they were, pending a review of the West Coast Conservation Management Strategy (CMS) in the next year.

"It's been a successful outcome for bach owners but it's only the first step in an ongoing process," Smith said.

The dialogue with DoC had been amicable and "successful", he said.
"It was more an issue of interpretation … We consider the submissions made on our behalf by our barrister helped clarify the relevant policies.

"We look forward to continue to working with the DoC in terms of this matter."

At a West Coast Conservation Board meeting in February, board members questioned a change by the department to the tenure of traditional family-owned baches, particularly in South Westland.

DOC Western South Island operations director Mark Davies denied undue pressure was being placed on bach owners.

However, he said a draft proposal "had been shared" with those affected as concessions were due for renewal.

Davies reiterated concessions for baches on conservation land was "a privilege, not a right".

At the time, Ngāi Tahu board representative and Harihari farmer Rob Wilson said the department should take a conciliatory approach to bach owners "instead of bullying", after agitated bach owners approached him.

Concerns included owners having to show occupancy for 100 days a year, and baches being made available to members of the public in the future under the new concession terms.

Smith estimated about 60 baches across the region are potentially affected going forward.

Many are on pockets of stewardship land or other historic reserve land handed over when DOC was formed in 1987 out of the former NZ Forest Service.

Typically the baches are in the lower reaches of rivers or streams near the coast and used seasonally for hunting or whitebaiting.

Smith said the issue was also a national one as it affected any holder of a concession for a bach on conservation land.

Smith said the West Coast group of bach owners foresaw a good working relationship with DOC going forward to ensure the traditional basis of tenure could continue.

"This is not an adversorial process … this is a case of trying to work with the DoC to find a resolution.

"We're not here to attack the department. We want to, and look forward, to working with the department."

As a result, the bach concession terms would remain the same for the foreseeable future.

"We have a review of the CMS coming up and we envisage we will need to ensure that the current terms relating to baches on conservation land under the current CMS continue under any new CMS document."

Davies said on January 15 "the reconsideration process" for three baches on public conservation land - one at the Waita River, one up the Arawhata River and the other at Kwitchatown - was completed in July 2023.

The department had relicensed the baches for a term of 10 years, he said.

Davies did not comment further on the broader tenure issue for other bach owners.

Local Democracy Reporting is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

More messages from your neighbours
4 days ago

Poll: Should the government levy industries that contribute to financial hardship?

The Team from Neighbourly.co.nz

As reported in the Post, there’s a $30 million funding gap in financial mentoring. This has led to services closing and mentors stepping in unpaid just to keep helping people in need 🪙💰🪙

One proposed solution? Small levies on industries that profit from financial hardship — like banks, casinos, and similar companies.

So we want to hear what you think:
Should the government ask these industries to contribute?

Image
Should the government levy industries that contribute to financial hardship?
  • 59.6% Yes, supporting people is important!
    59.6% Complete
  • 26% No, individuals should take responsibility
    26% Complete
  • 14.4% ... It is complicated
    14.4% Complete
916 votes
5 days ago

A Neighbourly Riddle! Don’t Overthink It… Or Do?😜

The Riddler from The Neighbourly Riddler

Do you think you know the answer? Simply 'Like' this post if you know the answer and the big reveal will be posted in the comments at 2pm on the day!

If you multiply this number by any other number, the answer will always be the same. What number is this?

Image
12 days ago

Have you got New Zealand's best shed? Show us and win!

Mei Leng Wong Reporter from NZ Gardener & Get Growing

Once again, Resene and NZ Gardener are on the hunt for New Zealand’s best shed! Send in the photos and the stories behind your man caves, she sheds, clever upcycled spaces, potty potting sheds and colourful chicken coops. The Resene Shed of the Year 2026 winner receives $1000 Resene ColorShop voucher, a $908 large Vegepod Starter Pack and a one-year subscription to NZ Gardener. To enter, tell us in writing (no more than 500 words) why your garden shed is New Zealand’s best, and send up to five high-quality photos by email to mailbox@nzgardener.co.nz. Entries close February 23, 2026.

Image