Free Paring - Targeted Rate
Geoff Kreegher shared Angela O'Leary, Hamilton City Councillor's post.
14 hrs ·
7 April at 07:53 ·
Thursday 6 Apr 17 Council voted in the proposal that will see ratepayers paying $14m over the next 10 years to implement a 2 hour free central city parking plan.
The votes - those against the proposal: me, Tooman, Pascoe and Southgate. Those for the proposal: Mayor, Gallagher, Taylor, Bunting, Henry, Casson, Macpherson and Yeung.
It's not quite a done deal yet and will go out for public consultation in the Annual Plan today, I’ll post the link when it’s live so you can have your say.
The plan moves from a user pays system to a ratepayer funded system meaning a rates increase to all ratepayers of an extra $26.57 a year. Just for parking.
The economics are simple - whatever goods and services are provided - they must be paid for by someone. And this plan, that someone is the ratepayer.
Supporters of the plan say they believe this plan will help reinvigorate the central city. We’ve tried all sorts of different variations of parking plans over the years and none of them resulted in any positive impact. Each time the businesses told us it didn’t work. So I have to ask myself why on earth we are doing this yet again.
If you prefer to shop at Chartwell or The Base or anywhere else, being able to park for 2 hours free in town isn’t going to change that. You go where the shops that you want to shop are, right? It doesn’t even seem logical when you look at it from that perspective.
The kicker here with the plan is that you can ONLY park for 2 hours on-street, then you either have to move to a parking building, or leave town.
You can’t decide to shop in one area of town for 2 hours then move to another to do more shopping. As I found out yesterday through my questions you won’t even be able to use your 2 hours free, nip over to say Hamilton East for 15 mins, then come back into town to use another “new” 2 hours free. Unless you’re happy to risk a $12 - $40 parking fine.
The enforcement will happen as you will park over a ‘dome’, and a parking warden takes a photo of your licence plate, that way it will show if you move your car when your 2 hours is up.
The reasons of those who support the proposal are that free parking will help revitalise the CBD.
Lower Hutt tried a similar free parking system over a trial period of 15 months and it didn’t work. They collect retail spend data all the time and their evidence showed that there was no increase in retail spend during the trial of free parking.
In fact, at busy times where there was a general increase over all city areas of retail spending, the free parking area actually decreased in terms of what their market share of the spend SHOULD have been. Proving that there was no benefit achieved from having a CBD with free parking.
Anyway that was the decision. Thoughts?
Parking is always a feisty debate and there is quite a bit of detail to this plan so if you have questions about the plan I'll keep a close eye on this thread and answer them.
Angela :)
Scam Alert: Bank cold calls
ASB is warning customers about reports of cold calls from scammers claiming to be from ASB. These scammers are trying to obtain personal information, including usernames, dates of birth, and verification codes sent to your mobile phone.
🛡️ The "Caller Check" Test
If you get a call from someone claiming to be from ASB and you’re unsure, just ask them for a Caller Check. You will then be able to verify the call through the app.
Remember, banks will:
❌ Never ask for your banking passwords, PINs, or verification codes
❌ Never need to know your full credit card number – especially the CVC
❌ Never ask you to download software or remotely access your device
❌ Never ask you to purchase gift cards or transfer funds.
If you have received a phone call and think your account has been compromised, call ASB on 0800 ASB FRAUD (0800 272 372), or visit your local branch.
🧩😏 Riddle me this, Neighbours…
I am an odd number. Take away a letter and I become even. What number am I?
Do you think you know the answer?
Want to stop seeing these in your newsfeed? No worries! Simply head here and click once on the Following button.
Some Choice News!
DOC is rolling out a new tool to help figure out what to tackle first when it comes to protecting our threatened species and the things putting them at risk.
Why does this matter? As Nikki Macdonald from The Post points out, we’re a country with around 4,400 threatened species. With limited time and funding, conservation has always meant making tough calls about what gets attention first.
For the first time, DOC has put real numbers around what it would take to do everything needed to properly safeguard our unique natural environment. The new BioInvest tool shows the scale of the challenge: 310,177 actions across 28,007 sites.
Now that we can see the full picture, it brings the big question into focus: how much do we, as Kiwis, truly value protecting nature — and what are we prepared to invest to make it happen?
We hope this brings a smile!
Loading…
