RE: Any lawyers here ?
A simple qs: For a Lawyer only or practicing studying lawyer ... and please only answer in private email.
QS is:
Its it ok to plaster the car rego of any public member and accuse them of a crime that may of looked like a crime but then was not ("before Police have investigated full facts"? or also encourage the Public to try and seek out others before a conviction, eg: trial but Public only, except simply no practicing judge to hear both sides first.
"While one can indeed report suspicious activity" and Police encourage Public to do so, once you make a judgement by here say of 1 person, and or beofre any one was actually convicted of even done a crime, ( tor then just find out the accuser was wrong)
Is not then the accuser held to account for such things as false accusation, and could also be judged as defamation ? and harming others through giving out Private information by use of a Computer device, and with out the consent or knowledge of the one being accused , its that correct?
(qs is fair one for behalf of "any" Public member being accused and details shared via electronic device, who has had no chance as yet for defence)
Poll: Should the government levy industries that contribute to financial hardship?
As reported in the Post, there’s a $30 million funding gap in financial mentoring. This has led to services closing and mentors stepping in unpaid just to keep helping people in need 🪙💰🪙
One proposed solution? Small levies on industries that profit from financial hardship — like banks, casinos, and similar companies.
So we want to hear what you think:
Should the government ask these industries to contribute?
-
59.3% Yes, supporting people is important!
-
25.3% No, individuals should take responsibility
-
15.4% ... It is complicated
A Neighbourly Riddle! Don’t Overthink It… Or Do?😜
Do you think you know the answer? Simply 'Like' this post if you know the answer and the big reveal will be posted in the comments at 2pm on the day!
If you multiply this number by any other number, the answer will always be the same. What number is this?
Poll: As a customer, what do you think about automation?
The Press investigates the growing reliance on your unpaid labour.
Automation (or the “unpaid shift”) is often described as efficient ... but it tends to benefit employers more than consumers.
We want to know: What do you think about automation?
Are you for, or against?
-
9.7% For. Self-service is less frustrating and convenient.
-
43.1% I want to be able to choose.
-
47.2% Against. I want to deal with people.
Loading…