RE: Any lawyers here ?
A simple qs: For a Lawyer only or practicing studying lawyer ... and please only answer in private email.
QS is:
Its it ok to plaster the car rego of any public member and accuse them of a crime that may of looked like a crime but then was not ("before Police have investigated full facts"? or also encourage the Public to try and seek out others before a conviction, eg: trial but Public only, except simply no practicing judge to hear both sides first.
"While one can indeed report suspicious activity" and Police encourage Public to do so, once you make a judgement by here say of 1 person, and or beofre any one was actually convicted of even done a crime, ( tor then just find out the accuser was wrong)
Is not then the accuser held to account for such things as false accusation, and could also be judged as defamation ? and harming others through giving out Private information by use of a Computer device, and with out the consent or knowledge of the one being accused , its that correct?
(qs is fair one for behalf of "any" Public member being accused and details shared via electronic device, who has had no chance as yet for defence)
Today’s Mind-Bender is the Last of the Year! Can You Guess It Before Everyone Else? 🌟🎁🌲
I dance in the sky with green and gold, a spectacle few are lucky to behold; I’m best seen in the south, a celestial sight—what am I, lighting up the New Zealand night?
Do you think you know the answer? Simply 'Like' this post and we'll post the answer in the comments below at 2pm on the day!
Want to stop seeing these in your newsfeed? No worries! Simply head here and click once on the Following button.
No gift? No stress
Let the Christmas elves at Mags4gifts.co.nz handle your last-minute shopping. For a limited time, gift a subscription with up to 40% off best-sellers like TV Guide, NZ House & Garden, and NZ Gardener. It’s the perfect Christmas present, sorted in minutes (and no one needs to know it was a last-minute surprise)!
Loading…